The Cabot/Koppers superfund site totals 140 acres. The site is geographically divided by Main Street with 90 acres belonging to Koppers in the west and 50 acres belonging to Cabot in the east. Koppers is a wood treating site (still in use) Cabot was a coal prodution site that has since been redeveloped into a shopping mall, car dealership, and other small retail stores. According to the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) the two parties held responsible are Cabot and Beazer East.

The Koppers site (Beazer East is the liable corporation).

• 90 acres of land
• 1916 the fisrt year Koppers site operational. The plant was, and still is, used to soak and treat timber used for the production of telephone poles. Since wood products are quickly destroyed in the subtropical climate of North Central Florida the poles were originally soaked in pools containing creosote and other chemicals. The treatments made the wood impervious to attacks by insects that would otherwise destroy the timber. The chemical soaking agents have changed with time adding to the total list of chemicals at the site.
• 1983 Koppers was listed as a superfund site.
• 1988 Beazer purchased Koppers. Beazer sold the plant operation but not the site back to Koppers. Therefore Beazer, as the owner, holds the environmental responsibility.
• 1990 the EPA approved of a clean-up plan for the site which was only partially implemmented by Beazer. The plan was to install a surface water treatement and containment system. The plan was not finished due to inadequate documentation of the status of the pollution.
• 1991 Cabot Carbon signed a consent to clean up the site and to pay reparations. Koppers refused to sign the agreement and instead signed a UAO Unilateral Administrative Order. A UAO is a document used by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) when companies responsible for pollution do not comply. It is an attempt to force a company to clean up their pollution. Penalties for not complying with a UAO include judicial action and forcing the company to pay three times what it would cost the EPA to clean the site. The UAO document for Koppers was ammended in 1994.
• 1995 the first testing wells at Koppers are created
• 2001 assumptions were made that the Hawthorne clay, a local type of clay, would prevent the contamination of the aquifer. It was believed that the contamination would flow horizontally and the clay would act as a barrier to downward migration.
• Original assumption proved incorrect what date? It has been proven that the clay will not protect the aquifer. Instead the pollution will flow right down through the clay. The Hawthorne clay will act as points of acess. Like fingers flowing directly into the aquifer
• 2002 EPA requested Beazer to preform additional soil and groundwater investigation.  Soil now known to be contaminated with dioxin and arsenic.
• The EPA had targeted March 2009 for a final decision on the site. GOAL NOT ACCOMPLISHED! And now a word from the president of Koppers.
• 2009 May 20th US Senator Bill Nelson D Florida, letter to EPA re. Koppers superfund site.

The Cabot site

• 49 acres of land mostly redeveloped into a shopping center and car dealership. There are four lagoons full of toxins on the site.
• 1945 Cabot has produced pine tar and pine oil at site
• 1949 industrial products isolation in three unlined pits
• 1967 Cabot sold the site
• 1970′s Developer breechs contaminated pits and contaminants discharge into the wetlands/creek. Pine tars and oils discharged into wetlands and creeks
• 1983 site listed as a superfund site
• 1991 Cabot Carbon signed a consent to clean up the site and to pay reparations. Koppers refused to sign the agreement and instead signed a UAO Unilateral Administrative Order. A UAO is a document used by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) when companies responsible for pollution do not comply. It is an attempt to force a company to clean up their pollution. Penalties for not complying with a UAO include judicial action and forcing the company to pay three times what it would cost the EPA to clean the site. The UAO document for Koppers was ammended in 1994.
• 1992-1993 a third party risk assesment of the soil for Cabot was done by Weston. The report proved that for the soil in the Northeast pit there is a one in a million chance of inducing cancer in humans through soil contact.
• 1994 Wells monitored by Weston are checked for contaminants.

• Official sources say that the discharge of contaminated water flows from both sites flow into the city sewer. Neighborhood monitors say that it flows into Springstead Creek.
• a shallow groundwater containment system, an interceptor trench, has been installed along N. Main Street. There are questions about the effectiveness of the trench.
• Soils at Cabot site are non-toxic according to Weston.
• Soil contamination remains in the NE pit but according to the risk assesment by Weston there was a one in a million chance of contracting cancer from the contaminated soil.
• Unfortunately Koppers is still in operation and still polluting next to a residential neighborhood. Koppers (Beazer) continues to pollute and threaten Gainesville while Cabot corporate activity is long gone.
• Cabot still has contaminated water below the surface.
• Koppers, although they have discussed soil treatement (soil washing), has not initiated any site repair.
• Cabot Carbon and Beazer know that it is cheaper to clean the site to industrial standards.
• The surrounding neighborhoods (Stephen Foster) are beter served if the companies will clean the site to residential standards. (a cleaner more expensive standard)
• Currently there is no progress toward removing polluted material

Source: http://kopperssuperfundsite.com/history.html, October 22, 2009